Between your members inside an online dating relationship, very was in fact university students (77

Between your members inside an online dating relationship, very was in fact university students (77

89 (SD = 2.27); 4.94 (SD = dos.97), each other groups differing ranging from 6 months and you may 11 numerous years of relationship; seven.76 (SD = 4.01), ranging from a couple and 19 years; and you may (SD = cuatro.82), anywhere between less than a year and you may 31 ages. 8%) and you may stayed which have family members, if you are those individuals managing their partners had been mostly functioning somebody (69.2%), where 53% got university or postgraduate degrees. Of one’s certified union members, 67% got college or article-scholar amounts, from which 89.8% have been employed, 2% resigned and you may 8.2% unemployed. The working disease with the hitched people is actually equivalent: 89.5% was in fact doing work, 2.9% have been retired and 6.3% have been out of work, and you can step 1.3% referred some other a position standing. In this category, 62.5% of the members got university otherwise postgraduate level.

Relationship Quality, picked to ensure criteria validity, is actually mentioned into Dating Get Means–Modified (RRF-R; Davis, 1996, adapt

The details shown try accumulated in the perspective of larger lookup ideas, which contains reveal sociodemographic and you will matchmaking testing, along with other balances within the range away from personal matchmaking.

Private relationship are evaluated depending on the Portuguese adaptation (Table step 1) of smaller kind of the fresh new Efforts Measure (Stanley, 1986), that has been translated according to after the interpretation and you may retroversion methods: once permission was given of the publisher, the original size are translated by the a couple of experts in the field, these two translations had been exposed to retroversion by the two professionals, you to definitely bilingual and one proficient in the utilization of new English language; ultimately, for every single adaptation was than the brand-new scale, opting for the aid of the brand new conditions and you may activities having higher proximity to help you they. The newest Portuguese version thus contains the fourteen fresh products and a similar respond to measure and you may is titled, after deliberation of the group, the non-public Union Size (‘Escala de Compromisso Pessoal’–ECP). To the finally phase of one’s translation procedure, the fresh instrument was administered to 3 participants for the purpose of confirming this new adequateness of words plus the unambiguous knowledge of what exactly, which have been chatted about with the participants immediately after application of brand new survey. As there have been zero comments stating if you don’t, those things remained a comparable.

With regards to the total lifetime of the connection, the average, in years, into more statuses demonstrated was, respectively: 2

by Lind, 2008). Resulting from a revision of the original Davis (1996, cited in Lind, 2008) scale, this instrument is intended to measure relationship quality perception, with the expectation that, according to the theoretical assumptions, both scales will positively correlate. The items are presented in the form of questions that the subjects will answer according to a rating scale of 1 (not at all) dil mil desktop to 9 (completely or extremely). The Portuguese version consists of a total of 46 items grouped in four dimensions: Passion, Confidence, Conflict and Intimacy. The RRF-R revealed psychometric properties ranging from good to excellent, obtaining an excellent internal consistency at the total scale level, with Cronbach’s alpha values between .97 and .98, for women and men respectively, and .81 and .97 at subscale level, a good temporal stability (significant correlations ranging between .70 and .87; p < .01) and high concurrent validity with a marital satisfaction scale (significant global score correlations between .88 and .85, for women and men respectively; p < .01). In the current sample, the RRF-R presented for the total scale, an excellent Cronbach's alpha of .96; .94 for the Passion subscale, .93 for Confidence, .77 for Conflict and .83 for Intimacy. The internal consistency of the total scale remained excellent for the four subsamples: .95 for participants in a dating relationship, .94 for those in a dating relationship with cohabitation and .97 for participants in both formal unions and married relationships.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *